What’s the problem?
The built environment, as it stands, is one of the most polluting industries in the world, responsible for nearly 40% of global carbon emissions. If we would just build the new houses required (around 13 thousand a day, per UN data) using today’s procedures, the consequences for the environment would be catastrophic. So how can we reconcile the need for new buildings and the one for zero carbon emissions? There are two main approaches to this complex problem: we either build less or build with better materials. These two approaches are not mutually exclusive and are both part of a movement that has steadily been gaining traction in the past decade: the “degrowth”, or “post growth”, movement.
If we want to have a chance to mitigate the climate crisis, reducing the environmental impact of our buildings is an indispensable step. However, transforming the built environment into a more sustainable industry is far from straightforward. The complications lie within two main contrasting needs that ought to be reconciled: the need for new buildings and the one for zero carbon emissions. According to the UN, the world population is expected to grow by almost 2 billion in the next 30 years and surpass 10 billion around 2080. This increase in population will almost certainly coincide with a rise in demand for housing.